Privacy law is the area of law concerned with the protection and preservation of the privacy Privacy is the ability of an individual or group to seclude themselves or information about themselves and thereby reveal themselves selectively. The boundaries and content of what is considered private differ among cultures and individuals, but share basic common themes. Privacy is sometimes related to anonymity, the wish to remain unnoticed or rights of individuals. Increasingly, governments and other public as well as private organizations collect vast amounts of personal information about individuals for a variety of purposes. The law of privacy regulates the type of information which may be collected and how this information may be used and stored.

The scope of applicability of privacy laws is called expectation of privacy In United States constitutional law the expectation of privacy is a legal test which is crucial in defining the scope of the applicability of the privacy protections of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The "expectation of privacy," as a legal concept with a precise definition, is found only in U.S. case law. It is.

Contents

Classification of privacy laws

Privacy laws can be broadly classified into:

General privacy laws have an overall bearing on the personal information of individuals and affect the policies that govern many different areas of information.

Specific privacy laws

These laws are designed to regulate specific types of information. Some examples include:

Privacy laws by country

Australia

In Australia For at least 40,000 years before European settlement in the late 18th century, Australia was inhabited by indigenous Australians, who belonged to one or more of the roughly 250 language groups. After sporadic visits by fishermen from the immediate north and discovery by Dutch explorers in 1606, Australia's eastern half was claimed by the British, the federal Privacy Act 1988 The Privacy Act 1988 is an Australian law dealing with the privacy of personal information. Part III Division I sets out what are interferences with privacy sets out principles in relation to the collection, use, disclosure, security and access to personal information. The Act applies to the Australian For at least 40,000 years before European settlement in the late 18th century, Australia was inhabited by indigenous Australians, who belonged to one or more of the roughly 250 language groups. After sporadic visits by fishermen from the immediate north and discovery by Dutch explorers in 1606, Australia's eastern half was claimed by the British Government and Australian Capital Territory The Australian Capital Territory is the capital territory of the Commonwealth of Australia and its smallest self-governing internal territory. It is enclaved within New South Wales, and regularly referred to as Australia's 'Bush Capital' agencies and private sector organisations (except some small businesses). The Office of the Privacy Commissioner The Office of the Privacy Commissioner is an Australian Government agency created by the Privacy Act 1988. It is an independent regulator responsible for investigating complaints about breaches of the Information Privacy Principles or the National Privacy Principles (relating to private sector organisations including not for profit organisations) is the complaints handler for alleged breaches of the Act. Some Australian States The Commonwealth of Australia is made up of six states and two major mainland territories. There are also lesser territories that are under the administration of the federal government have enacted privacy laws.

The Australian Law Reform Commission [1] completed an inquiry into the state of Australia's privacy laws in 2008. The Report entitled For Your Information: Australian Privacy Law and Practice [2] recommended significant changes be made to the Privacy Act, as well as the introduction of a statutory cause of action for breach of privacy [3]. The Australian Government committed in October 2009 to implementing a large number of the recommendations that the Australian Law Reform Commission had made in its report [4].

Canada

Main article: Canadian privacy law Canadian privacy law has evolved over time into what it is today. The first instance of a formal law came when, in response to international pressure, the Canadian government introduced data protection provisions into the Canadian Human Rights Act. Subsequently, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms outlined that everyone has "the right

In Canada The land occupied by Canada was inhabited for millennia by various groups of Aboriginal peoples. Beginning in the late 15th century, British and French expeditions explored, and later settled, along the Atlantic coast. France ceded nearly all of its colonies in North America in 1763 after the Seven Years' War. In 1867, with the union of three, the federal 'Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act is a Canadian law relating to data privacy. It governs how private-sector organizations collect, use and disclose personal information in the course of commercial business. In addition, the Act contains various provisions to facilitate the use of electronic documents. PIPEDA was (PIPEDA) governs the collection, use and disclosure of personal information in connection with commercial activities and personal information about employees of federal works, undertakings and businesses. It generally does not apply to non-commercial organizations or provincial governments. Personal information collected, used and disclosed by the federal government and many crown corporations is governed by the Privacy Act The Privacy Act is Canadian federal legislation that came into effect on July 1, 1983. The act sets out rules for how institutions of the federal government must deal with personal information of individuals. Some salient provisions of the legislation are as follows:. Many provinces have enacted similar provincial legislation such as the Ontario Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act which applies to public bodies in that province.

There remains some debate whether there exists a common law tort for breach of privacy. There have been a number of cases identifying a common law right to privacy but the requirements have not been articulated.[1]

In Eastmond v. Canadian Pacific Railway & Privacy Commissioner of Canada[2] Canada's Supreme Court found that CP could collect Eastmond's personal information without his knowledge or consent because it benefited from the exemption in paragraph 7(1)(b) of PIPEDA The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act is a Canadian law relating to data privacy. It governs how private-sector organizations collect, use and disclose personal information in the course of commercial business. In addition, the Act contains various provisions to facilitate the use of electronic documents. PIPEDA was, which provides that personal information can be collected without consent if "it is reasonable to expect that the collection with the knowledge or consent of the individual would compromise the availability or the accuracy of the information and the collection is reasonable for purposes related to investigating a breach of an agreement".[2]

United Kingdom

Main article: Privacy in English law

As a member of the European Convention on Human Rights The European Convention on Human Rights (long title: Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) is an international treaty to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe. Drafted in 1950 by the then newly formed Council of Europe, the convention entered into force on 3 September 1953. All Council of Europe, the United Kingdom The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland[note 7] is a sovereign state located off the northwestern coast of continental Europe. It is an island country, spanning an archipelago including Great Britain, the northeastern part of the island of Ireland, and many small islands. Northern Ireland is the only part of the UK with a land adheres to Article 8 ECHR, which guarantees a "right to respect for privacy and family life", subject to restrictions as prescribed by law and necessary in a democratic society towards a legitimate aim.

However, there is no independent tort law doctrine which recognises a right to privacy. This has been confirmed on a number of occasions.

United States

Main article: Privacy laws of the United States United States privacy law embodies several different legal concepts. One is the invasion of privacy, a tort based in common law allowing an aggrieved party to bring a lawsuit against an individual who unlawfully intrudes into his or her private affairs, discloses his or her private information, publicizes him or her in a false light, or

The idea of a right to privacy was first addressed within a legal context in the United States. Louis Brandeis Louis D. Brandeis was a United States Supreme Court Justice from 1916 to 1939. He was born in Louisville, Kentucky to Jewish parents who had immigrated from Europe. He enrolled at Harvard Law School, graduating at the age of twenty with the highest grade average in the college’s history (later a Supreme Court justice) and another young lawyer, Samuel D. Warren Samuel Dennis Warren was a Boston attorney, published an article called 'The Right to Privacy' in the Harvard Law Review The Harvard Law Review is a journal of legal scholarship published by an independent student group at Harvard Law School in 1890 arguing that the constitution and the common law allowed for the deduction of a general "right to privacy".[4] Their project was never entirely successful, and the renowned tort expert Dean Prosser William Lloyd Prosser was the Dean of the College of Law at UC Berkeley from 1948 to 1961. Prosser authored several editions of Prosser on Torts, universally recognized as the leading work on the subject of tort law for a generation and still widely used today (now in its 11th Edition). Furthermore, in the 1950s, Dean Prosser became Reporter for argued that "privacy" was composed of four separate torts, the only unifying element of which was a (vague) "right to be left alone."[5] These elements were

  1. appropriating the plaintiff's identity for the defendant's benefit
  2. placing the plaintiff in a false light in the public eye
  3. publicly disclosing private facts about the plaintiff
  4. unreasonably intruding upon the seclusion or solitude of the plaintiff

Russia

Applicable legislation:

  1. Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, signed and ratified by the Russian Federation on December 19.2005;
  2. the Law of the Russian Federation “On Personal Data” as of 27.07.2006 No. 152-FZ, regulating the processing of personal data by means of automation equipment. It is the operator who is required to comply with that Act.

As a general rule consent of the individual is required for processing, i.e. obtaining, organizing, accumulating, holding, adjusting (updating, modifying), using, disclosing (including transfer), impersonating, blocking or destroying of his personal data. This rule doesn't apply where such processing is necessary for performance of the contract, to which an individual is a party.

Republic of China (Taiwan)

Computer Processed Personal Information Protection Act was enacted in 1995 in order to protect personal information processed by computers. The general provision specified the purpose of the law, defined crucial terms, prohibited individuals from waiving certain rights.

See also

Legislation

References

  1. ^ See for example, Somwar v. McDonald's Restaurants of Canada Ltd, [2006] O.J. No. 64 for a discussion on this
  2. ^ a b Eastmond v. Canadian Pacific Railway & Privacy Commissioner of Canada, June 11, 2004 2004 was a leap year that started on a Thursday. In the Gregorian calendar, the year 2004 was the 2004th year in the Anno Domini or Common Era, the 4th year in the 3rd millennium and of the 21st century, and the 5th in the 2000s decade
  3. ^ Law Resources
  4. ^ Warren and Brandeis (December 15, 1890). "The Right to Privacy". Harvard Law Review IV (5): 193. http://www.law.louisville.edu/library/collections/brandeis/node/225.
  5. ^ Dean Prosser William Lloyd Prosser was the Dean of the College of Law at UC Berkeley from 1948 to 1961. Prosser authored several editions of Prosser on Torts, universally recognized as the leading work on the subject of tort law for a generation and still widely used today (now in its 11th Edition). Furthermore, in the 1950s, Dean Prosser became Reporter for, 'Privacy' (1960) 48 California Law Review 383
Privacy Privacy is the ability of an individual or group to seclude themselves or information about themselves and thereby reveal themselves selectively. The boundaries and content of what is considered private differ among cultures and individuals, but share basic common themes. Privacy is sometimes related to anonymity, the wish to remain unnoticed or
Principles Expectation of privacy In United States constitutional law the expectation of privacy is a legal test which is crucial in defining the scope of the applicability of the privacy protections of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The "expectation of privacy," as a legal concept with a precise definition, is found only in U.S. case law. It is
Privacy law Canada Canadian privacy law has evolved over time into what it is today. The first instance of a formal law came when, in response to international pressure, the Canadian government introduced data protection provisions into the Canadian Human Rights Act. Subsequently, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms outlined that everyone has "the right, USA United States privacy law embodies several different legal concepts. One is the invasion of privacy, a tort based in common law allowing an aggrieved party to bring a lawsuit against an individual who unlawfully intrudes into his or her private affairs, discloses his or her private information, publicizes him or her in a false light, or, European Union The Data Protection Directive is a European Union directive which regulates the processing of personal data within the European Union. It is an important component of EU privacy and human rights law. The directive was implemented in 1995 by the European Commission, England
Areas Consumer Consumer privacy laws and regulations seek to protect any individual from loss of privacy due to failures or limitations of corporate customer privacy measures. They recognize that the damage done by privacy loss is typically not measurable, nor can it be undone, and that commercial organizations have little or no interest in taking unprofitable, Medical The main subject of medical privacy is the 'medical record' which historically has been a paper file of the entire medical history of the patient. Various electronic forms of medical records have existed in western countries, but mostly in an unintegrated fashion. This lack of integration has in a large part facilitated privacy. While the patient', Workplace Employees typically must relinquish some of their privacy while at the workplace, but how much they must do so can be a contentious issue. Employers might choose to monitor employees activities using surveillance cameras, or may wish to record employees activities while using company owned computers or telephones
Information privacy Information privacy, or data privacy is the relationship between collection and dissemination of data, technology, the public expectation of privacy, and the legal and political issues surrounding them Law Information privacy laws cover the protection of information on private individuals from intentional or unintentional disclosure or misuse. The European Directive on Protection of Personal Data, released on July 25, 1995 was an attempt to unify the laws on data protection within the European Community. As a result, customers of international, Financial Debates on the first sense of the phrase have many different points of view, from crypto anarchists who want to create a completely decentralized and anonymous banking system, to others who support enhancing the power of the government to find financial information in order to fight terrorism, Internet Internet privacy consists of privacy over the media of the Internet: the ability to control what information one reveals about oneself over the Internet, and to control who can access that information. Many people use the term to mean universal Internet privacy: every user of the Internet possessing Internet privacy, Political Political privacy has been a concern since voting systems emerged in ancient times. The secret ballot is the simplest and most widespread measure to ensure that political views are not known to anyone other than the voter—it is nearly universal in modern democracy, and considered a basic right of citizenship. Even where other rights of privacy, Personally identifiable information Personally Identifiable Information , as used in information security, refers to information that can be used to uniquely identify, contact, or locate a single person or can be used with other sources to uniquely identify a single individual. The abbreviation PII is widely accepted, but the phrase it abbreviates has four common variants based on (Personal identifiers), Privacy enhancing technologies Privacy Enhancing Technologies is a general term for a set of computer tools, applications and mechanisms which - when integrated in online services or applications, or when used in conjunction with such services or applications - allow online users to protect the privacy of their personally identifiable information (PII) provided to and handled
Advocacy Organizations ACLU The American Civil Liberties Union consists of two separate non-profit organizations: the ACLU Foundation, a 501(c)(3) organization which focuses on litigation and communication efforts, and the American Civil Liberties Union, a 501(c)(4) organization which focuses on legislative lobbying. The ACLU's stated mission is "to defend and preserve, Center for Democracy and Technology The Center for Democracy and Technology is a Washington, D.C. based non-profit advocacy group that works to promote liberal values and constitutional liberties in the Digital Age, CPSR Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility is an organization focusing on the aspect of computer technology on society. It awards the Norbert Wiener Award for Social and Professional Responsibility, Future of Privacy Forum The Future of Privacy Forum is a United States public policy advocacy group set up to address privacy issues, seeking business practical best practices that benefit consumers. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7738891.stm New privacy group to shape policy]</ref> Co-chairman Jules Polonetsky was former chief privacy officer for AOL. The, EPIC Electronic Privacy Information Center is a public interest research group in Washington, D.C. It was established in 1994 to focus public attention on emerging civil liberties issues and to protect privacy, the First Amendment, and constitutional values in the information age. EPIC pursues a wide range of activities, including privacy research,, EFF The Electronic Frontier Foundation is an international non-profit digital rights advocacy and legal organization based in the United States. Its stated mission is to:, GNI, Privacy International, Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
See also Anonymity, Data security, Identity theft, Surveillance (en mass, state), Human rights, Personality rights

Categories: Privacy law | Privacy

 

The above information uses material from Wikipedia and is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Some facts may not have been fully verified for accuracy. [Disclaimers]
This page was last archived by our server on Sat Jul 31 19:48:11 2010. [ refresh local cache ]
Displaying this page or its contents does not use any Wikimedia Foundation's resources.
The owners of this site proudly support the Wikimedia Foundation.


Internet Privacy: Why Library of Congress Twitter Archives Could be a Bad Thing - Geek Shui Living (blog)
news.google.com
Internet Privacy : Why Library of Congress Twitter Archives Could be a Bad Thing

Geek Shui Living (blog)

In a worse case scenario, though, they could and likely would be used against you in a court of law . Here are a couple of examples of ill-posted tweets, ...

Library of Congress Will Save Tweets New York Times



all 2,586 news articles &raquo;
Google News Search: Privacy law,
Fri Apr 16 06:58:03 2010
Iranian Cyber army jpg
securityprivacyandthelaw.com
Iranian Cyber army jpg
455px x 608px | 28.90kB

[source page]

1 Iranian Cyber Army Puts Twitter On Hold Around 10 pm last night popular social networking site Twitter was apparently hacked by a group calling themselves the Iranian Cyber Army Iran and Twitter have had a rocky relationship

Yahoo Images Search: Privacy law,
Fri Jul 9 15:02:58 2010
FTC assesses first fines for violating kids online privacy law ...
parryaftab.blogspot.com
FTC assesses first fines for violating kids online privacy law ...

Parry Aftab

hu, 10 Jun 2010 14:15:00 GM

FTC assesses first fines for violating kids online . privacy law. | ITworld.

Google Blogs Search: Privacy law,
Sun Jun 20 19:37:58 2010